Google and the Aggridant

Google search on aggridant or aggridants is interesting.  The word seems to be useful in terms of the B-value of Uniqueness and this should be added to the appropriate Pearltrees.

Need to add "Abraham Maslow" herein to check the Newsreel and wire the word better to "Abraham Maslow"

If you triangulate with an aggridant, you will increase your odds of bounary penetration.

Signal to noise, Shannon guys. Signal to noise.

Discrimination in many dimensions.

Get to work.

Hempel's "nomic nexus" is Web 2.0, get it? How far does it go before it escapes into the future? Or how far until we resonate it with B-reality?

Looking at a world sociogram of conversations would be interesting, and could provide hierarchical anonymity in the right hands.

The aggridant social system is the one which makes the best choices for everyone and has a decent transmitter!

Action Maze Design Criteria in Cloud Boundary interface (membrane viz. found in Lukasiewicz-Kirchhoff Machines).  Variable: reaction time and correlational analyses with other instances down the maze.  This would show "RT bandwidth" which seems to me to be a missing link.

Design could randomize maze nodes along arbitrary axes.  B-values, perhaps, for the fascinated psychologist-mathematican-historian-transcender!

And with the patented "Cannon Homeostatic Bonnet"  it all makes perfect sense when you change over to the torsion pendulum.  Huh?

Clara for those who understand and are bored. What would her Z score be, I wonder?

Let's extend suicide bombing into it's covering law.  The whole thing started when Lord Bubba tried to teach them about the boundary functions.


He told them that to infiltrate the other side and therefore insure a positive entry, you first have to atomize yourself.  Lord Bubba meant that you had to go into the future by spreading your spiritual self thin, not your body.


The Mechanomorphs picked this up and are now treating it like the
rag in the mouth of the dog.   And they have been convinced that
the whole thing is about getting attention, regardless of value.



Like Maslow would say, if you blow yourself up, the game is over. 
Any mentor who counsels his student to call attention to an issue by blowing himself up is necessarily a sociopath because he shows no concern for human things.  He is in a world of his own, quite delusional.  Yet he still has influence.

A single word brought you here, and it will prove to be a uniquely important word. That is because the word, "aggridant," is a nidus.

It is possible to trace the word from today back through Abraham Maslow, and further back to W. L. Dove. Similarly, one can trace "self-actualization" back to Kurt Goldstein. By crossing corpae with vocabulary words, piles are formed around the words. These piles can be studied in terms of differential gravities in the holarchic space.

So in terms of the History of the Future of the Web, the word tree of "aggridant" can be traced exactly (as of July, 2009) to Dove, so "Dove" and "aggridant" and Maslow and other buzz on "aggridant", etc., gets wired back to the nidus.

In Web 3.0 terms, an aggridant is a "complete" (as in metric space where the tails of the asymptotic subsystems stay inside the membrane) representation of a sub-group in a uniqueness hierarchy or holarchy. It is a vector space centered on the nidus surrounded by vocabularistic clouds which will eventually tie humans together in the Interocitor. But this is under wraps at the Wright-Patterson Air Force Base.

Third.ORG will see you now.

Mediadonis is not deadjim.

Sniffing for effects of Zeitgeist Day (Ides of March).

Inodalyn was released today by Humanus

Chomsky on BBC saying that "best way" is from below (bottom up). Implies that real change "never" comes from above, because all of these people are rotten bastards. (Vulgar Marxists).
This denies the fact that virtuous leadership is possible. Chomsky seems to forget that he can be a humanist and not know it, just like one can be happy and not know it. One just needs a map, as Colin Wilson so aptly maintains.

Dichotomizing is a disease. Dichotomy transcendence is the key, but we can step forward into growth (up) or backward into safety (down). Looks like we might be learning what to do with the word "species."

Problem seems to me is lack of teachers' abilities to spot the early sociopath and pay him special mind. If he is also highly intelligent, he'll wind up as Cheney-type. Our "government" is our semi-permeable membrane, which is supposed to keep out all the bastards and stinkers. Once they get in, they can rise to the top like anyone else, but their Weltanschauung is kaput.
See the "Puritan Gift" book.

What this means is giving our kids MAPS--Cognitive Maps--of healthy people, not sick ones. Everybody knows about Uzi's before they learn about B-memes. We live in language. Language is our gas and there is a stoichiometry for it. There could be a meaning sieve, etc. Metalanguage represents the umwelt and must not be forgotten. But most of all, show healthy examples as well as dystonic ones. Obviously, we've let a hell of a lot of crooks run the show of late. Enter, the Orthomentor, cracking us back into shape no matter how painful the fun. (One must ask about ineffective programs here in terms of Maine, etc.) Columbia is now good example of total waste of resources. Need to spend the money on educating the young about how to have a B-life.

Nice quote from Maslow's "Politics 3" for today:

"In other words, all of this political and social and management machinery can be deduced from humanistic psychology."

Obama is really talkng about species eupsychian politics or at least species politics because he stands for dichotomy transcendence. He gives the Zeitgeist balls in this respect.

Trick is to just tip the balance, because at the growing tip is the decision to step forward into growth or backward into safety. "Politics 3" challenges today's youth in re Obama just as it did in the sixties. We can't afford to make the same mistakes because it takes a lifetime to change things.

Must see what Colin Wilson is up to these days in terms of sniffing the ether.

Limen Calculus and Stoichiometry in Synesthesial Space

Important to flush out the curves. If there is a stoichiometric form to the liminal differences, then this might lead to crossover patching.

In terms of the Obama-Clinton contrasts, note Maslow's quote: "You can either step forward into growth or step back into safety." Risk assessment.

Early adopters and pioneers are at the growing tip. Mechanomorphic cripples are a regressive force.

The remaining THREE candidates might indicate a desire for a third party. This would
be the Eupsychian Party.

If we're being pushed backward into safety by realizing who is in charge of everything,
does this mean a migration to the boonies? It's no Israel in terms of eupsychia,
but there's no bullseye over us on Google Earth, either. There's nothing like a
quiet mountain valley where you can leave your keys in your car in town. So does that
mean that creativity will blossom in small towns?

I think I'll settle on this blog for the primary Maslow connection because it's easy to find for those interested in viewing social systems with a Maslowian lens. Just remembering the word "aggridant" will get you here in pretty short order.

Core philosophy:

Maslow : Social Psychology :: Einstein : Physics.

Some of you will understand that notation immediately; others will not. The MAT can cause a stroke, but is probably necessary in this new environment.

Anyway, the AGGRIDANT is really a class. It defines the biologically superior and dominant person. This is the best person for a particular job, all the way up and down the social system. Note the word "biological." And listen to Maslow on this.

If the web itself is to actualize new revolutions, then it must be seen as a web-qua-tool (interesting: Webquat and WebQuaTool are semi-meaningful strings and none of the hogs have grabbed them, just like Orthomentoring and probably all kinds of posito-linguistic combinations. I will do my best to track these in order to see what history will tell us). This means that we must see the web as a tool of triangulation and convergent thinking.

Using the web as a social tool (marketing) is like tuning a shortwave radio. This implies that we must first construct noise filters, narrowband, and attenuators for browsers in order to reach those who are tuning for the B-web.

There is also the chemistry of the webspace. For example, with neo-capitalism on one end and anarchy/socialism on the other (?) what causes the social surface tension to break and form globules versus what is catalytic to hierarchical integration? If we believe in punctuated sysetms and know a little chemistry and stoichiometry, we can make a transmitter into the future. This, I suppose, is euteleological efficiency, or B-power.

This is the focus of the nidus Eupsychia.org.

Objective: Popularize Maslow
Goal: Experimental Eupsychian Town
Marketing: Reality Crap Shows and eupsychian foundations (make money for toilet paper, etc.).
Method: T-Group Hierarchical Categorization (nidus bifurcitui morbosa).
Possible outcome: Eupsychian Town Under Attack (Israel)

Servant of Chaos convinced me that a public notepad is a step into growth.

I'm an old man with an old vi toolkit, so my web presence is of the boiler room type. Please excuse my blunders with and cut-paste. The objective is euminimalism! Minimalism with mojo.

Any other blogs you see here are pretty much scrap heaps, but since orthomentoring is a new field of endeavor, I wanted to hook it to Maslow, who will end up being the orthomentor for the 21st century.