If you triangulate on the aggridant, you will increase your odds of bounary penetration.

Signal to noise, Shannon guys. Signal to noise.

Discrimination in many dimensions.

Get to work.

Hempel's "nomic nexus" is Web 2.0, get it? How far does it go before it escapes into the future? Or how far until we resonate it with B-reality?

Looking at a world sociogram of conversations would be interesting, and could provide hierarchical anonymity in the right hands.

The aggridant social system is the one which makes the best choices for everyone and has a decent transmitter!

Action Maze Design Criteria in Cloud Boundary interface (membrane viz. found in Lukasiewicz-Kirchhoff Machines).  Variable: reaction time and correlational analyses with other instances down the maze.  This would show "RT bandwidth" which seems to me to be a missing link.

Design could randomize maze nodes along arbitrary axes.  B-values, perhaps, for the fascinated psychologist-mathematican-historian-transcender!

And with the patented "Cannon Homeostatic Bonnet"  it all makes perfect sense when you change over to the torsion pendulum.  Huh?

Clara for those who understand and are bored. What would her Z score be, I wonder?

Let's extend suicide bombing into it's covering law.  The whole thing started when Lord Bubba tried to teach them about the boundary functions.


He told them that to infiltrate the other side and therefore insure a positive entry, you first have to atomize yourself.  Lord Bubba meant that you had to go into the future by spreading your spiritual self thin, not your body.


The Mechanomorphs picked this up and are now treating it like the
rag in the mouth of the dog.   And they have been convinced that
the whole thing is about getting attention, regardless of value.



Like Maslow would say, if you blow yourself up, the game is over. 
Any mentor who counsels his student to call attention to an issue by blowing himself up is necessarily a sociopath because he shows no concern for human things.  He is in a world of his own, quite delusional.  Yet he still has influence.

A single word brought you here, and it will prove to be a uniquely important word. That is because the word, "aggridant," is a nidus.

It is possible to trace the word from today back through Abraham Maslow, and further back to W. L. Dove. Similarly, one can trace "self-actualization" back to Kurt Goldstein. By crossing corpae with vocabulary words, piles are formed around the words. These piles can be studied in terms of differential gravities in the holarchic space.

So in terms of the History of the Future of the Web, the word tree of "aggridant" can be traced exactly (as of July, 2009) to Dove, so "Dove" and "aggridant" and Maslow and other buzz on "aggridant", etc., gets wired back to the nidus.

In Web 3.0 terms, an aggridant is a "complete" (as in metric space where the tails of the asymptotic subsystems stay inside the membrane) representation of a sub-group in a uniqueness hierarchy or holarchy. It is a vector space centered on the nidus surrounded by vocabularistic clouds which will eventually tie humans together in the Interocitor. But this is under wraps at the Wright-Patterson Air Force Base.

Third.ORG will see you now.