Zeroth Scratchpad - Where this adventure shall have begun

Guaranteed into Eternity with "CryoTrust Permanente 3.0"
Open source, virtue-driven, platform free, grid mirrored, and always lauging at you behind your back.

B-language could be extended into Web 3.0, etc. There are new spheres of being and meaning.
All good programmers understand elegance, for example, where the beauty comes from loop efficiencies and tuning kernels with Occam's razor.

No good future until everyone laughs.

The more bandwidth we get, the more crap we seem to stuff in the pipes and on the stacks. Why do we like bloat instead of substance? Only one doing it right seems to be Google. And Apple. They understand elegance, whereas Microsoft doesn't. Here is Theory Z at work. Microsoft is mechanomorphic. D-sites swindle us more and more. There is a special kind of disgust when you are baited and then tricked into giving up something in order to learn. There should be filters for the D-net. Monkeys, shiny coins, and idiots at the helm.

Funny: Hempel was right about the nature and limits of scientific understanding. We can now actually begin to fathom and manage the nomic nexus elegantis. Better pay attention to people like Maslow and Polanyi, who wondered about naming as creating new objects rather than classifying old ones.

.
There is a real danger in primary process writing in this new desktop environment. One has to disentangle associations. But these associations must fit into the nomic nexus if the thing is going to work. The idea is to triangulate and converge on the B-nidi, not
diverge into noise. Some of the new words people are making up are descriptors of snow we have yet to see,
which means they are noise. This ignores the Shannon-Weaver plugin to the stoichiometry.

Thing is with Chomsky and the others that the wonderful efforts aren't publicly placed in the hierarchy. We now could, and *should* be percolating talent in new ways and drafting people for certain jobs, etc. If something is factally clear, sound, virtuous, honest and helpful, why has it not been amplified for some and attenuated for others? Seems if we could move from aboutism to action, we would be a lot better off, but when the dominant-schlemiel types are overabundant like carpenter bees, it's hard not to retreat into safety. Who wants to get stung except the strong ones.

Point is about Chomsky and the others that they can't not care. I suppose there is a value-deprivation torture that only the sensitive ones can feel.

Maslow: [paraphrase] "...worry that the definition of neurotic is when a person *doesn't* show symptoms and should."

This necessarily defines us as a neurotic societyi, because we're showing no balls or neck sacks as we're being of being swindled out of a good future by dominant D-politicians. Only the B-man is sensitive enough and courageous enough to be called to arms.

Don't see what would be wrong with a little mesmerism. The Zoroastrians are disappearing just like the Blackfoot, so we had better get out the peace pipes and
talking sticks and listen carefully and keenly for the wisdom of the mentors. Point is that they see reality differently and we need that data to plug into the Orgone Boxes.

The driving pressure is there certainly. And the *only* way to be healthy is to point out lies and swindles by the schlemiels we have elevated into leadership positions everywhere. It's really unbelievable that it happened just like the name thing. How do we protect ourselves from these swindles?

The D-men get plenty of free rent in the brains of the many, because they're so easy to swindle. We had better learn to be honest about that and face up to it.
This forges a new tactic: B-swindling. This is the old thing about anon. gift giving and B-altruism (if that can be extended into the B-realm). The bigger the gift, the more "forceful" it can be in changing things. But only the B-men understand that. The D-men see it like the big penis, which they want to use as a history bat.

How to handle neurosis in Eupsychia. Truth-deprivation (lies)-->Paranoia, etc. Result is Durkheim's anomie, and maybe escape into net. So best thing to do is
to use the available tools and to have Buffet or
somebody set up a Cray farm with a sniffer for the
B-Umwelt! Why do we spend our money on expensive evil sniffers we want to sniff out good? Simple: we don't know how to tell the difference-->don't know our collective ass from a hole in the ground-->get swindled again. It doesn't look and feel like a swindle because they confiscated all of the C.W. Mills books one night while we were sleeping.

How 'bout a flash-buy on Maslow's "Eupsychian Management"? When Mentoring goes down one day, we
might want some comforting reading in the torture chambers the D-men have given us called airports.

Look, up in the sky......Truty, Justice and the American Way.

"Whata would Superman do?" If he takes his time to consult with J.R. Bob Dobbs and Howard Stern, he'll
not be able to catch that plane... He doesn't *need* to consult. For ten points, compare and contrast the humunculi of Superman and Dick Cheney.



Colin
Could test words against the B-sieve by testing their distribution in the B-value wordlist. Could the word be more instructive? Seems like we should go the
other way and reduce things, like replacing "write this to the file but leave my window just as it is" by ":w" but this would mean we would have to learn a new clucking sound.

Another example of a brain tumor in the neo-neo-cortex we call the web is the needless necessity of using six lines of code to do what I can do by this.
Did the crap come from the need to help? Makes the middle name swindle one of history's biggest jokes.
For example, who will fix it now?

Big problem is how to talk about the eugenics thing.

Infoshop News - The Clown at Midnight Lining up more vectors. We absolutely must learn to discriminate out the sociopaths, and to do this, we'll need to develop better eyes and noses and ears so we can sniff them out in the Umwelt before we are swindled yet again. Hell, countless people have just lost the use of their middle names right under our noses, without resistance. For some of us, it's an insult by the mechanomorphic shits and we would have told them--had we been consulted--that they could save the bytes by not adding layers and layers of meaningless goop to everything, gumming up the works because of their short-sightedness and abuse of power. Who said you could take my middle name away? If we don't catch it in the bud, it will creep up on us. The social stoichiometry and calculus of it takes into account that we are a minority. Look how easily we have been robbed of rich connections in cyberspace because we are no longer recognizable to those who knew us before.

Maslow quote on swindling not stopping good here.

I often wonder what event will trigger the shift.